IMPLICATIONS OF THE DIFFERENT CONCESSION OF
REMUNERATION ON ORGANIZATIONAL COMPROMISE IN THE ADVOCACIA-GERAL DA UNIÃO.

Name: ROBERTO CARLOS ZUCCON

Publication date: 19/12/2017
Advisor:

Namesort descending Role
MARILENE OLIVIER FERREIRA DE OLIVEIRA Advisor *

Examining board:

Namesort descending Role
JOÃO LUIZ CALMON NOGUEIRA DA GAMA External Examiner *
MARILENE OLIVIER FERREIRA DE OLIVEIRA Advisor *
MARISON LUIZ SOARES Internal Examiner *

Summary: The subject of this research is organizational commitment whose objective is to investigate the distinct granting of remuneration to groups of administrative support staff in the Advocacia-Geral da União (AGU) and its implications on the understanding of distributive justice and on the instrumental, normative and affective commitment . The research will be carried out with two groups: a) it does not have a single structured career, formed by employees of the Institution's board, requisitioned / assigned in exercise at AGU, b) and the second group, only requested / assigned, structured career. The problem consists in the fact that these two groups receive differentiated remuneration,
although in exercise in a same public organ. As a theoretical basis, the
concepts of organizational commitment, understanding of organizational justice and reward system are being researched. The empirical study is based on data from a field research that will be carried out at the Federal University Advocacy (AGU), following the model proposed by Mathieu and Zajac (1990), which consists of joining two scales allied to the sociodemographic dimension of researched. The first questionnaire was composed of socio-functional questions about the three dimensions of organizational commitment, using the Meyer and Allen scale (1997), validated in Brazil by Medeiros and Enders (1998) and by Bandeira, Marques and Veiga (1999). The second one was focused on the
perception of distributive justice, whose scale was validated by Mendonça, Pereira, Tamayo and Paz (2003). Statistical analysis procedures were as follows: descriptive statistics; confirmatory factorial analysis; Cronbach Alpha consistency assessment, correlation analysis and multiple regressions. The results of the relationships of the demographic, functional and remuneration elements with the variables of commitment and perception of distributive justice in the CPCE and SPCE groups reached: a) negative beta, with strong link, indicating that the higher the educational level the lower the affective, instrumental and normative commitment and the perception of distributive justice; b) correlations between the time of exercise in the institution were
intense with distributive justice, significant with the affective commitment and with less expression with the dimensions of the instrumental and normative commitment; c) significant positive correlations between age with affective impairment and distributive justice. And neutral correlation between that variable with instrumental and normative; d) positive relationship between married, separated and single civil variable with the perception of distributive justice, we must register the regularity of decreasing averages in the sequences
of married and single segments in three dimensions and in the perception of distributive justice; e) correlation of the variable remuneration directly
proportional to the average with the dimensions of commitment and perception of distributive justice within each group CPCE and SPCE; f) in an explanatory and congruent way, the three - dimensional correlations of the commitment to the perception of distributive justice resulted in a correlation coefficient of positive tendency, being of greater intensity with normative and smaller with the instrumental. The CPCE sample, when compared to the SPCE group, showed a higher average in the perception of distributive justice and in the affective, instrumental and normative dimensions; g) confirmation that education as a predictive variable has inverse explanatory power on affective, instrumental,
normative commitment and the perception of distributive justice with negative beta indicating that the higher the educational level the lower the commitment and the perception of distributive justice of individuals; h) confirmation that the variable age has predictive power, although low, on the three dimensions of the commitment; i) confirmation that distributive justice, as an independent variable, presents a positive relation with the three dimensions of commitment, being more related to normative; j) after regression, that the independent variables remuneration, marital status and length of service presented very low influence with the three dimensions of commitment and perception of distributive justice; k) little explanatory power of the independent variables about distributive justice, except schooling; l) the correlation between remuneration and the affective and normative constructs in the SPCE sample and between it and the instrumental dimension in the CPCE group was verified; m) it was confirmed that distributive justice has moderate predictive power over the three dimensions of impairment
in the SPCE sample; n) confirmation of the independence between the affective and instrumental constructs; positive correlation between affective and normative impairment variables and between instrumental and normative variables; and links between the three dimensions of organizational commitment to the perception of distributive justice.

Access to document

Acesso à informação
Transparência Pública

© 2013 Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo. Todos os direitos reservados.
Av. Fernando Ferrari, 514 - Goiabeiras, Vitória - ES | CEP 29075-910